Joined
·
806 Posts
Once again, another Racer this time being Bayliss possibly making a comeback and someone asks Schwantz (1 GP world championship due to Rainey being paralyzed?) and he always wants to talk about the rider like they are some kind of douche.
last year he was asked his thoughts on Stoner, and he basically called him a Pu$$y...and he should man up etc etc. lost the edge, yet he comes back and wins races-So insert foot for schwantz
also Stoner has already eclipsed Scwantz's race wins already and matched his 1 title against the GOAT of all things.
Now the Bayliss discussion comes up he is basically saying well maybe he could do it, but does he have what it takes and Spies is not there so the field is soft?
Seriously not to take away due credit to schwantz's 1 championship-but Bayliss has (3 WSBK Titles & a BSB title) and against some top notch riders as well.
But in all sincerity, is Scwantz that much of a dick? just cause he retired before he would of liked and is all busted up with but 1 title, where others are not?
last year he was asked his thoughts on Stoner, and he basically called him a Pu$$y...and he should man up etc etc. lost the edge, yet he comes back and wins races-So insert foot for schwantz
also Stoner has already eclipsed Scwantz's race wins already and matched his 1 title against the GOAT of all things.
Now the Bayliss discussion comes up he is basically saying well maybe he could do it, but does he have what it takes and Spies is not there so the field is soft?
Seriously not to take away due credit to schwantz's 1 championship-but Bayliss has (3 WSBK Titles & a BSB title) and against some top notch riders as well.
But in all sincerity, is Scwantz that much of a dick? just cause he retired before he would of liked and is all busted up with but 1 title, where others are not?