Joined
·
969 Posts
Congratulations on the weight loss Turbo. What did you not like about the Prince?Thanks.
yeah, I haven't been a fan of Pinarello since the 'Prince'
Congratulations on the weight loss Turbo. What did you not like about the Prince?Thanks.
yeah, I haven't been a fan of Pinarello since the 'Prince'
I rode the Evo and liked it very much. It is very light. I found it stiff but not unforgiving. The Super Six is a bit more compliant and less expensive.I should have made that more clear. The Prince was the last bike by Pinarello that I liked. I don't particularly care for the styling of the Dogma and their lower end models look similar to other makes other than the forks.
Have you ridden with Sram? I could never really get comfortable with it. I prefer having seperate up/down levers vs. guessing at the amount of travel to upshift with the one Sram lever.However, the EVO Red package is very attractively priced for what you actually get.
I'm with you Turbo- looking forward to some crits this spring.2-3 lap races in the park so I guess that's a CRIT. Going to sign up for a few of these races:
http://www.bikereg.com/inc/content/flyers/2011SSflyerfull.pdf
Felt similarly on my ride today. My LBS allowed me to swap into a smaller frame with a longer stem- so much better. Also, replaced aero wheel with Mavic Kyserium SR and a Dura Ace cassette- amazing and saved 3/4 of a pound!In any event I had the chance to ride on the new components. I took a familiar road where there's a slight incline. The last time I rode there I pedaled at 17-18mph. Today on a windy day I went up that same road at 22mph. So the fact that I've lost a ton of weight and have some top notch components was worth at least 4mph on a familiar stretch of road.
The Ultegra Crank is definitely stiffer. My ankle got sore towards the end of the ride. I've lost some steam in my sprint. I seem to have been faster on the old Aluminum Trek that I had before. Maybe the steel is flexing a bit and killing some of my sprint effort. I can't really tell. The bike overall accelerates very well. It honestly felt like a new ride.
After the frame, wheels are the next for lightening...How do you guys rate lightweight wheels against other light parts (crank, shifter, frame)?
I just finished a race to city bike conversion for my wife and am now on to my next project, a hardtail mtb. Starting with a bare frame, because it´s more fun.
That makes sense Turbo. But if I were building a bike, I would start with a lighter, properly sized frame followed by lighter wheels. Then I would seek a lighter crank/groupo. To me, the frame is the foundation of the bike. It is also the largest single component- largest single weight saving choice. The other stuff is easily and often replaced. In the end it all comes down to how much you have to spend.I thought it was the opposite actually.
I've been told that a mediocre frame with an excellent wheelset beats a great frame with average wheels any day.
I originally bought a 54 CM Center-to-center seat tube with a top tube of 55 CM. We fit the bike with a 90 MM stem. The shorter stem made the bike twitchy on the downhill. LBS replaced the frame with a smaller frame that measures 53 CM Center-to-center seat tube. It has a 54.5 CM top tube and a 100 Mm stem. The replacement bike is lighter and more stable on the downhill. In my particular case, moving down a frame size also resulted in a better fit and a noticeable improvement in power.will your LBS now let you switch back to the correct sized frame? Smaller frame is ok as long as it fits you.....going to a longer stem when most bikes already have too short of a top tube is no bueno.....you would have been better off with the larger frame