^
Oh, now I get it. Now I think everyone should have a gun. Maybe two.
Huck, huck.
Hey...dimwit. Everything has changed. Now your enemy has nukes...and you don't. I can't wait to watch on televison when you and your Idaho buddies march into Washington and get hit with that heat ray that the boogiemen have. Shout be a real hootenanny, huh?

It'll give me a good reason to stay up and watch the late-night monologues.
Dorks

.
Honestly, what do you think would happen if an insurection was needed? Suppose the military was with the government and many of the people were as well? ALL people will never desert the government and some of them have guns, perhaps many do. Does it sound like it's worth getting all upset about? Just chill, dude, you'll be dead soon enough anyway (but have a long life). Just stick to writing your congressperson. If your Representative doesn't represent your point of view, but keeps getting elected, just go with it. It's not worth worrying about anyway, in the long run. Stay away from Safeways too.
Now suppose the military took over. That's a different story. They can do whatever they want to. Perhaps that is the most likely outcome. What would you think about that? It depends on who is runny things I suppose but probably I'd choose the military. Order is always the most important thing when there are so many people. Law and order is the first priority for a society. Haiti could use some now. So could Africa. Notice anything common to the two? Africans. Ever heard of that book, Guns, Germs and Seeds(?

)? Theory is that in Europe, Asia and North America a warming after the last ice age made that temperate zone the center of social and economic growth. Warming in the equatorial zone stymied those societys. All power shifted north or south, away from the equator, where it previously had been. The first advantage of the temperate zone was that you could grow grain. Grain led to animals, etc. Black people never recovered, especialy when you consider slavery and racism. I don't know if that explains anything or not. It's just a theory

(if I got it correct - not sure that I did),

.
I'm pretty sure the differences between a muzzle loader and a Gatling gun change the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. Today is different from yesterday. The only question is, where to draw the line? You draw it on your arm...with a knife, probably:wacky

.