Sport-touring: BMW K1600GT and VFR1200F - Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-01-2016, 07:26 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
sqd8r's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,178
Sport-touring: BMW K1600GT and VFR1200F

Hey guys,

Looking at moving (back) into sport-touring bikes. As always this time of year brings out some good deals.

Iíve found locally a new (never registered Ė full warranty) 2013 VFR1200F from the local dealer and a demo 2013 BMW K1600GT with 8K Km on it warranty until June 2016. Both are $8K below their respective list price. The BMW would require a trade-in, the Triumph Rocket, the Honda wouldnít.

Any thoughts on either model would be appreciated.

2006 BMW HP2
2015 Triumph Rocket III Roadster

Sour grapes are a lesser man's fruit.

Originally Posted by Busy Little Shop
The [fact] that the RC45 was a "relative failure" is what matters most...

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
sqd8r is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-02-2016, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
rjjablo's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shoreview MN
Posts: 1,453

BMW is Touring only, to big and to heavy to be considered anything else. I have the BMW K1300S and it is more oriented towards the sport end. This is its last year though.
rjjablo is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-03-2016, 02:45 AM
Street and Track Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Minnesooda
Posts: 3,888
Everybody that has one of those Beemers raves about them...

CCS #33
CRA #533
CQC Motorsports
2011 CCS Midwest Rookies Cup GTO #1
2014 CRA Formula 40 #2
2015 CRA Nov Unlimited SS #1
2015 CRA Nov Unlimited Superbike #1
2015 CRA Nov Unlimited GP #1

2008 CBR 1000rr (Race)
2012 Multistrada 1200 (Street Ride)
mattmansell is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-03-2016, 08:13 AM
Senior Member
DesperateSP2's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Alps... the original ones!
Posts: 2,607
The BMW is far smoother than the Honda and less tiring on long hauls. For a six cylinder engine with all that power it's also surprisingly fuel efficient.
I test rode one extensively and was very impressed with it but, in the end, I prefer the RT riding position.
For the weight both bikes handle surprisingly well, but hat tip goes to the BMW for having a better front end, as planted and stable as no other bike I've ever ridden.

Now the bad news. BMW has been struggling since the bike launch with water pumps. They have had big problems keeping them from leaking and dealers aren't always very keen on warranty. Most owners carry a bottle of premix coolant on long trips and check level every morning before starting for the day.

Both bikes are so tightly packed as to be maintenance nightmares, but the BMW is actually worse. The Honda has the benefit of two cylinder heads and Unicam design, making valve adjustments somewhat easier.
Oh, and good luck changing the K1600 front shock absorber.

Shame on me, my heart is black.
DesperateSP2 is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-17-2016, 09:51 PM
He with the senior member
Old Baldy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Lyon, MI USA
Posts: 5,671
I also would not consider the BMW to be a sports-tourer, though I'm sure it is faster in real-world riding than its weight would suggest. It's simply too big, too heavy to be considered in any way "sporty", in my opinion.

The Honda is probably a decent bike, but not spectacular. It's slower and less sporty and certainly less versatile than something like a Multistrada.

But I'd be looking at something like the R1200RT or even the R1200GS as a fantastic sport tourer. Lighter, more economical, sportier than either of those two, and, for, me, the low-frequency thrum of a twin makes for a much more relaxed feel for any ride over about 300 kms.

For example, I rode a friend's BMW S1000XR quite extensively in South Africa last week, and when compared to his new BMW R1200GSA, I found the GSA to be a much nicer sport-tourer - the XR is certainly faster, but the high-revving four always sounded like it was trying too hard, too frenetic, too busy....for a long ride. I am sure one gets used to it, but the GSA simply felt less strained, more relaxed and I found that long days were easier to achieve with less effort.

If it has to be between the two you mention, then I'd go for the 1600GT, because it's a BMW and they are beautifully engineered, IMO.
Old Baldy is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-28-2016, 10:51 AM
Senior Member
RAZR51's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,558
I'd go for the Honda, it's more sporty, plus you get to keep the Triumph.
RAZR51 is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome