not happy - Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums
Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums  

Go Back   Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums > Ducati Message Boards > Ducati Superbikes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default not happy

changed the heads on my 749/924 to the later model s heads ....yes I'm sure I picked up top end power ,I get an almost two stroke like rush @ 8000 rpm.
but this has come at some expense .Where it used to pull strong from 5000 with the standard heads and high velocity porting it won't do that anymore.
I'm wondering if I can go back to the standard cams but keep the s heads?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:37 PM
CrimsonCloak's Avatar
Gold Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 567
Default

What do the dyno charts look like for the before vs after?
__________________
1997 748
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bedford corners, bedford corners
Posts: 79
Default

I assume you have a power commander, are you running a custom map? Also, what exhaust do you have on it?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ofallon, MO
Posts: 163
Default

Also don't forget that a port with high velocity will make more torque down low and in most case's loose some on the top end due to the flow restriction. An 84 crossfire corvett with it's 1 inch square intake manifold ports would fry the tires all day long, but they would run out of breath at high rpm. So it is a trade off and a compromise.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 03:15 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default

no dyno charts ...Akro exhaust ...custom map from the good folks at Ducshop
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 03:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default

from the feel of it I have pushed the power up the curve ,engine feels much more like the original 749 only much more of it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 04:05 AM
chris steedman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seespotweld View Post
changed the heads on my 749/924 to the later model s heads ....yes I'm sure I picked up top end power ,I get an almost two stroke like rush @ 8000 rpm.
but this has come at some expense .Where it used to pull strong from 5000 with the standard heads and high velocity porting it won't do that anymore.
I'm wondering if I can go back to the standard cams but keep the s heads?
The higher and faster the cams lifts the more airspeed the ports will see. Putting the bp cams back in will make it slower. You need a real dyno analysis , you may find with the fuel dialed to the new s cams and heads you will be a winner all round.

If your going to be doing some diy work i would focus on the combustion chamber . The chamber side shrouding wich blocks the inlets valves line of sight to the exhaust valve is where the power is hiding.

Another thought ,the fuel map was never optimised for your high velocity heads either . There may have been another load of hp to come.
__________________
life is work

For Ducati engine blueprinting/crank balancing/performance cylinderhead prep/ porting / big valve conversions-www.cjsracing.co.uk

For 1st class dyno-tuning ,mapping, custom eproms- and a whole load of other cool stuff
www.hypertrick.net

www.bikeboy.org
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 05:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default chris

would that not lower the compression
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 02:09 PM
chris steedman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seespotweld View Post
would that not lower the compression
Yes statically , but it will be dynamically better catching more air per cycle. The 924 pistal kit has more than enough compression for the job.

Were not talking about removing a large amount of material . Just some in the right places. You can always take 0.2mm from the head after
__________________
life is work

For Ducati engine blueprinting/crank balancing/performance cylinderhead prep/ porting / big valve conversions-www.cjsracing.co.uk

For 1st class dyno-tuning ,mapping, custom eproms- and a whole load of other cool stuff
www.hypertrick.net

www.bikeboy.org
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 04:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default

thanks for the advice Chris ,nice to hear from someone who's been there
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan
Posts: 418
Default Chris

PS: I did degree the cams to the original settings ...no problems at all at idle .I understand from reading Brads work that the revised settings were to fix an idling issue. Also the map I'm using from Ducshop was developed for my exact ,well except for the exhaust, setup. The engine feels very crisp and responsive on the throttle .Very difficult in my local to get to a dyno ,800 miles minimum.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009, 12:53 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bedford corners, bedford corners
Posts: 79
Default

Reading Seespotweld's problem makes me wonder whether going the "full Monty with aggressive cams and head work is the way to go on a (mostly) street bike? I have an 03 749s with a 924 kit and a half system putting out about 114 hp on the dyno. i recently purchased 06 749s heads that were worked on by Martin Brickwood - his collets, valves and ports polished. Was going to throw on a 54mm full system have some extensive dyno work done and see what I'd come up with. however i have no interest in having the bike make all its power north of 8000 rpm's. the fun with a big bore kit is the increase throughout the power band. what do you guy's think??
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009, 04:33 AM
chris steedman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbike View Post
Reading Seespotweld's problem makes me wonder whether going the "full Monty with aggressive cams and head work is the way to go on a (mostly) street bike? I have an 03 749s with a 924 kit and a half system putting out about 114 hp on the dyno. i recently purchased 06 749s heads that were worked on by Martin Brickwood - his collets, valves and ports polished. Was going to throw on a 54mm full system have some extensive dyno work done and see what I'd come up with. however i have no interest in having the bike make all its power north of 8000 rpm's. the fun with a big bore kit is the increase throughout the power band. what do you guy's think??
A well re-worked/ported head will make more power everyware from 4000rpm up as long as the airspeed is correct. The port chokes are 2x 29mm barrells wich is about right for a 924cc and un masked 38mm valves with a cam that lifts to 11.5mm. I dont think you will be dissapointed .

On another note seat of the pants dyno feed back has no relavance unless the fuel is perfectly optimised on the dyno/track for each combo thats being tested.
__________________
life is work

For Ducati engine blueprinting/crank balancing/performance cylinderhead prep/ porting / big valve conversions-www.cjsracing.co.uk

For 1st class dyno-tuning ,mapping, custom eproms- and a whole load of other cool stuff
www.hypertrick.net

www.bikeboy.org
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2009, 06:30 PM
biela's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bilbao, Spain
Posts: 3
Send a message via MSN to biela
Default

Hello,

Just a question. In this paragraph, "If your going to be doing some diy work i would focus on the combustion chamber . The chamber side shrouding wich blocks the inlets valves line of sight to the exhaust valve is where the power is hiding. "

Does it refer to the red rounded zones in the photo? The photo is a 996 head, sorry.

Well, I have put a thinner base gasket in order to adjust the squish (from 0.6 to 0.2 mm). This downs 3 cc the volume of the combustion chamber and the compression ratio increases near 12:1.

I think I could grind these zones in the combustion chamber (increasing the volume up to 3 cc more or less) and maintain the compression ratio near the original 11.5:1.

Am I right?

Thanks
Attached Images
 
__________________
2001 ST4s
1999 750 SSie
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2009, 04:10 PM
chris steedman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biela View Post
Hello,

Just a question. In this paragraph, "If your going to be doing some diy work i would focus on the combustion chamber . The chamber side shrouding wich blocks the inlets valves line of sight to the exhaust valve is where the power is hiding. "

Does it refer to the red rounded zones in the photo? The photo is a 996 head, sorry.

Well, I have put a thinner base gasket in order to adjust the squish (from 0.6 to 0.2 mm). This downs 3 cc the volume of the combustion chamber and the compression ratio increases near 12:1.

I think I could grind these zones in the combustion chamber (increasing the volume up to 3 cc more or less) and maintain the compression ratio near the original 11.5:1.

Am I right?

Thanks
Hi

It does not apply to a 996 head. There is no shrouding or power to be had grinding anything here !
__________________
life is work

For Ducati engine blueprinting/crank balancing/performance cylinderhead prep/ porting / big valve conversions-www.cjsracing.co.uk

For 1st class dyno-tuning ,mapping, custom eproms- and a whole load of other cool stuff
www.hypertrick.net

www.bikeboy.org
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2009, 05:43 PM
CrimsonCloak's Avatar
Gold Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 567
Default

Here is the area on a 748/916

(emphasis added on the shrouding)
Attached Images
 
__________________
1997 748
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2011, Speedzilla.com, Inc

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2