Depressing 748 DYNO run - Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums
Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums  

Go Back   Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums > Ducati Message Boards > Ducati Superbikes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:28 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Depressing 748 DYNO run

Hi guys,

Ran my 2000 Ducati 748 for the first time last week on a Dynojet with results that didn't quite meet my expectations. It has a Termi half system, and a Ultimap UM211 chip- otherwise it's stock. Bike has 7800 miles. Wish I could post up the dyno sheet, but my camera isnt working, so this will have to suffice:

Max Power= 84@10,550
Max Torque= 46@8,700


Seems kinda low to me...anyone else? Running conditions were 58 degrees, humidity 59 percent- so the weather shouldn't have made a difference. I know every dyno is different, but??? Didn't opt for the $25 extra air/fuel chart that was offered BEFORE he ran it, but sure wish I had!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:38 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

Also should mention that the HP/TQ lines were both fairly smooth, no significant dips in either one throughout the RPM range.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:38 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

Do a search. We’ve had a few discussions on dyno's. Basically if you run it on a different dyno under the same condition you will get different results.

But that dose seem a bit low for the bike.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:43 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ya, I know... but those numbers are a far stretch from the "median" I would hope to have from dyno'ing the bike on several different dynos. Wondering what I should look for to be the culprit- air/fuel ratio? anything else??
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 06:09 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (Holliday)

That's what a 748 makes with a slip and a chip.

Looks like every other 748 dyno run I've seen... you should be very happy! Now you know why you need to work so hard to keep up with 600's at the track.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 06:12 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

Here's a link to a 748 that Brad black ran:
http://www.moto-one.com.au/per....html
Dunno if yours is a 'strada'...I'm not an SBK guy.

Seems you're a bit below what he showed, but comparing across dynos usually isn't satisfying, from what I've seen.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 06:55 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (900CR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 900CR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's what a 748 makes with a slip and a chip.

Looks like every other 748 dyno run I've seen... you should be very happy!</TD></TR></TABLE>

900CR- I've read alot of your posts, and I know you're nothing short of a database for Ducati info, but I'd have to say I'm not with you on this one... I've paid special attention to 748 dyno numbers over the past year since I've owned the bike, and the majority (it seems) pump out around
90+/-1hp. Cranking out 84hp means that I'm ~6hp off of that mark, and as we all know, 6hp is difficult to squeeze out of a motorcycle- especially a Ducati.
This makes me think something is off- I'm guessing it's the air/fuel, but I cringe at the thought of paying another $50, just to have the bike dyno'ed again for the air/fuel test to be done AND the $350 it will cost to have a custom tuning done.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 06:57 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the link Speeddog! Made me feel worse... but thanks! lol
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 07:15 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (Holliday)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Holliday &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I've paid special attention to 748 dyno numbers over the past year since I've owned the bike, and the majority (it seems) pump out around
90+/-1hp. Cranking out 84hp means that I'm ~6hp off of that mark, and as we all know, 6hp is difficult to squeeze out of a motorcycle- especially a Ducati.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Just going by what I've seen with my eyes at a local, (and very busy), dyno shop. Your expectations would be considered 'high'.

I'm really not trying to blow smoke up your skirt, or hurt anyone's feelings who swears they have a 98HP 748, but they just don't pull the stratospheric numbers sometimes posted... Dyno numbers are kinda like laptimes.

You can expect to see some variations between dyno's... Be happy your bike is pulling ~85HP... I'll bet the operator could have made 2-3 more runs and showed you a number closer to your expectations... Funny how Dynojet's work that way.


Save your money for gear and billet
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 07:38 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (900CR)

Holliday,
Be happy with the 85Hp that you're getting from your stock 748.
I've done a run on my 853 & ONLY ended up with 96.4Hp. I was expecting(hoping) a little over 105 ... hahhahaha
Anyway ... a stock 748 is supposed to produce 75Kw (100Hp) AT THE CRANK ...!!!
If you only knock a (very) conservative 15% OFF the claimed crank figure, for drive train losses, you're doing well ...
Smile dude. Your bike's in fine form.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 10:03 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

Your figures sound about right. We dyno-ed my 748 at my shop using our DynoJet 250i and got about 88hp. I have Arrow slip-ons and a PC III.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 10:43 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

how many runs did they do? the first one is always rubbish, altho the peak doesn't usually change unless it's wheel spinning.

i run them until i get at least 2, usually 3 very much the same. so i do at least 3, most often 4, very occaisionally 5 runs for the start off combination. if you're doing +/- fuel runs then once you've got the consistant start every run for a specific combo will be almost identical. i often finish where i started just to check consistancy - been fine so far. if you stop and restart often you need a few runs to settle it down again.

if it's got a bad fuel filter or something like that you'll drop power pretty quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 10:46 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (moomba)

Please bear in mind that there are a lot of little variations in the measuring technique- Dynos can't measure power directly; they measure the torque and the rotational speed to calculate the power according to the following formula:

Power (Hp) = {Torque (lbs.ft.) x RPM} / 5252

So if the dyno under-reads by 2 lbs ft, the error for the power reading will be:

Error = (2 * 10550)/5252 = 4 bhp.

I would suggest superimposing the old and new torque curves on top of each other. Doing this for the power curves tends to heighten any differences further up the range and mask differences further down the range. Using torque curves tells you more- if your torque is dropping off from say 8000 rpm more than before, you'll know more about your engine than from looking at the power figures.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 12:21 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

Normal.

Just curious - what were you anticipating?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 12:56 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

torque is a measurement, horsepower is a calculation. And I have persoanly seen a 748 with Sil motor slip ons, chip, and full dyno tune. push 97 hp on two different dynos (same bike)
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 01:56 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (foopenhiemer)

My 748/870 Dyno'ed at 101. It has a half system and a FIM chip.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 02:11 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (Ducaholic)

Heres a 748 that makes 106rwhp

Before you doubt it, read on.
http://www.visi.com/~moperfserv/748hc.htm
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 02:20 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (Ducman851)

Nice
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 03:26 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (Holliday)

I got 84.9 peak HP at 10K on a Factory dyno (maybe equivilent to 100 HP on a Dynojet) with 800 cc Wiseco pistons, SPS cams, Carillo rods, Falicon crank, FIM chip, 50 mm SIL full exhaust, DP small tail-mounted crankcase breather box, BCM ported heads, and running Nutec gas - so 85 on a stock motor doesn't seem so bad.

Interestingly, Desmotorsport built a motor with the exact same mods as mine, and dynoed it at Factory - it made 10 more peak HP than mine, but with much less midrange. The only significant variable I can think of is the timing (which they set differently), so that might be something to play with if you want to get more on top and are willing to pay for it. (I left mine alone since I'd already bought a 996 motor to replace the 800)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:23 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depressing 748 DYNO run (JeffKoch)

If this is off base I apologies but I am just curious.

I am in Denver Colorado at about 8500 ft. and have a 2004 998S. It is stock with the exception of 45mm Termignoni CF slip ons and the ECU for them. Would anyone have any idea about what this should be putting out in the way of HP and TQ?

Ride Safe.
Marc
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2011, Speedzilla.com, Inc

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2