I suspect the OP would have come off a looking bit more reasonable if. instead of demanding a ban for a negative experience, he had entitled this thread "Negative Experience with CCW."
Instead, even if we accept everything the OP posted as true (and of course there are two sides to each story, as this thread has pointed out) he demands that we ban the sponsor because he had what appears to have been a pretty emotional disagreement about the service and treatment he received.
As an outsider (I have not done business with CCW although I am interested in some of their parts), they have come out of this looking better and much more reasonable than the OP has.
Just my
