Speedzilla Motorcycle Message Forums - View Single Post - I often wondered why Canadian's with a grudge flocked to US motorcycle boards...
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 01:12 PM
nycstripes's Avatar
nycstripes nycstripes is offline
Meatball's Dad
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,091
Default I often wondered why Canadian's with a grudge flocked to US motorcycle boards...

I was unaware that our neighbors to the North do not have the freedom of speech as we understand it. It makes more sense now why the politic trolls like Gog come here so often...its basically not a freedom he can enjoy at home in Canada...
So maybe we can charge a toll for the trolling posts that come across the border? We could start a BS Tax and use it towards tires..track season cometh..
I feel so congressional (liberal) now, I have found someone to tax.


The following is from a Washington Post report on the ongoing loss of freedoms in Canada:
Whether you call it over-sensitive political correctness or an abiding sense of fairness and decency, Canada has embraced it like a . . . well, never mind. Through its human rights laws and hate speech codes, broadcast standards and myriad "voluntary" industry guidelines, Canada makes no bones about its determination to impose liberal-minded limits on public discourse.
Although the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms put free speech and a free press into the bedrock of Canadian law, neither the public nor Canada's courts views these rights as absolutely as Americans have come to view the First Amendment. The Canadian Supreme court has ruled in a series of cases that the government may limit free speech in the name of other worthwhile goals, such as ending discrimination, ensuring social harmony or promoting equality of the sexes.
Canada's most powerful tool against politically incorrect speech is its hate speech code, which prohibits any statement that is "likely to expose a person or group of persons to hatred or contempt" because of "race, color, ancestry, place of origin, religion, marital status, family status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation or age." Prosecutors are not required to show proof of malicious intent or actual harm to win convictions in hate speech cases, and courts in some jurisdictions have ruled that it does not matter whether the statements are truthful.

---------------------------------------------------------
Lorne Gunter, The Edmonton Journal
Published: Sunday, March 30 2008
All you need to know about how rotten the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is -- how undemocratic and anti-freedom it has become -- is that in hate-speech complaints, the commission has a 100-per-cent conviction rate.
No one who has ever been hauled before it for allegedly uttering hate speech has ever been acquitted.
Such a rate is impossible for a democratic institution because the state is never always right and the defendant never always guilty. This happens in dictatorships where those in charge control every aspect of the judicial system and there is no impartiality or independence. But it should not happen in a purportedly open, unprejudiced tribunal.
__________________
Quotes From Turd Burglar 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Area 51 View Post
I'm fifty and ride a sport bike. I guess I'm a tool too - just like you, bros. Got a few hunting guns too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Ferguson View Post
Can't say for sure but I suspect Rand Paul is an ass.
Pot and Kettle..together forever. Hypocrisy knows no boundaries..
Quote:
Originally Posted by nero View Post
IQ51 still fits, i see...

_________________
The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.

ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
www.OATHKEEPERS.ORG
Reply With Quote