Quote:
Originally Posted by sqd8r
Read the Dennis Noyes article discussing the Ducati straight line speed superiority and you'll see what I mean. Noyes breaks it down to the percentile, including how long they remain at full throttle and how much of an impact the straight line ability has over the course of the season.
Hayden for 2006 had the measure of Rossi. Ultimately a title decides that. That doesn't mean Hayden is the better rider  but if the leg humpers are going to insist it's the rider and not the entire package then that is the result.
You can't have it both ways bud.
Bottom line, if it was just the rider when Rossi went over to Yamaha then answer me this; why did Rossi need to take the most successful Moto GP team manager and his entire multi-title Honda winning crew with him?  Then consider that Jeremy Burgess is not in favour of the one tire rule... Seems to me that it isn't the tires. |
answer me this then. even if he did not NEED Jerry why would he not want to take him? Honda was talking crap and trying to control him so he left and took his friend and team, what is the point? if jerry did not want to go he would not have
