First off- when Rossi won on the M1,
it was the rider, the bike was never at anytime better than the RC211V.
Second- Hayden has never had, and will never have, "
the measure of Rossi". That is just hysterical. Hayden has had 81 starts on a Repsosl Honda in the last 5 years and has 3 wins. Rossi has 38 during the same period.
Finally- Regarding the Ducati. The electronics and handling are very good and the Bridgestones are superior to Michelins. More importantly, the Ducati seems to have a clear power advantage over the M1.
So, how do you figure that there is
evidence to the contrary?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sqd8r
When Rossi won two seasons on the Yamaha everyone was touting how it was the rider never the bike.
Now we've had two seasons and two titles bypass Rossi and all of a sudden it's the Honda's superiority to the Yamaha that was the difference, not Hayden having the measure of Rossi.
Now it's the Ducati straightline speed  being superior to the poor old crappy I4 Yamaha, despite all evidence to the contrary.
|